SOC 2 Type I vs Type II: How to Choose and Prepare for Both

Understanding the nuances between SOC 2 Type I and Type II can feel daunting, especially for organisations newly embarking on their compliance journey. As Europe’s first ISO 42001-certified cyber compliance agency, Atoro frequently encounters companies unsure which report to pursue—or how to prepare for either one. In this article, we’ll clarify key differences, discuss scenarios in which each type is most suitable, and provide practical tips for readiness. By the end, you’ll have a clear roadmap to plan your SOC 2 strategy and meet customer expectations. Atoro Brand Voice Guide… Blog Structure and SEO …

What Is SOC 2 Type I?

A SOC 2 Type I report focuses on your controls at a specific point in time. Essentially, the auditor checks whether you have the required policies, procedures, and security measures on the day of the audit. Think of it as answering the question, “Right now, do you have these controls in place?”

• Design Over Time: Type I audits validate the design of your controls rather than their consistent operation.
• Snapshot Perspective: If you pass a Type I, it indicates the controls exist but doesn’t prove they were followed over an extended period.

Many organisations view Type I as a stepping stone—a fast way to demonstrate initial compliance or reassure clients that the right structures are in place. However, most mature enterprises will eventually ask for Type II, which proves ongoing operational effectiveness.

What Is SOC 2 Type II?

Where Type I is a snapshot, Type II is a full-length feature. In a SOC 2 Type II engagement, the audit or evaluates your controls over a defined period—often six or twelvemonths. They look for evidence that policies were not only established but consistently followed.

• Operational Effectiveness: Expect monthly log reviews, incident report checks, and sample testing.
• Higher Assurance: Because controls are tested over time, Type II signals stronger credibility to your customers.

Most established SaaS companies prefer Type II when dealing with enterprise clients, as it reassures them that security practices aren’t just “on paper”—they’re part of daily operations.

Key Differences at a Glance

Below is a quick side-by-side comparison to help guide your decision:

1. Duration:
   • Type I: Single point in time
   • Type II: Several months (6–12 typically)
2. Effort:
   • Type I: Quicker to achieve because it’s a one-day snapshot
   • Type II: Requires ongoing monitoring and evidence collection
3. Use Case:
   • Type I: Ideal for newer programmes or urgent customer requests
   • Type II: Often expected by larger clients and investors, offering higher assurance
4. Level of Assurance:
   • Type I: Confirms controls exist
   • Type II: Confirms controls exist and work consistently

When to Choose Type I

If you’ve only recently begun building your security programme—or if a customer wants a SOC 2 report as soon as possible—a Type I can be your best starting point. It proves you have the foundational controls in place (e.g., policies, backup processes, logging tools).

Common scenarios include:

• A startup that set up security controls a few months ago and wants quick evidence for early customer inquiries.
• An organisation that sees Type I as a checkpoint for design completeness before diving into Type II.

While a Type I alone won’t satisfy everyone, it’s a fast way to demonstrate real progress. Many companies treat it like an internal milestone, using the auditor’s feedback to shore up any gaps before moving on to Type II.

When to Choose Type II

If you have enough runway—say, 6 to 12months—to implement and sustain your controls, moving straight to Type II offers maximum value. Larger clients frequently demand a recent SOC 2 Type II because it carries more weight; it shows you maintain robust security consistently, not just on audit day.

Typical motivations for Type II:

• Aiming to win enterprise contracts that insist on proven, ongoing security.
• Sufficient internal resources (e.g., a dedicated security or compliance team) to manage continuous evidence collection.
• A long-term commitment to compliance maturity, where Type II becomes an annual event and a key trust-building mechanism with customers.

Preparing for a Type I Audit

Preparation for Type I centres on documenting the design of controls:

1. Conduct a Readiness Assessment: Check whether you have all required policies—such as access control, incident response, and encryption—formally documented.
2. Confirm Implementation: Ensure technical measures (like backups, firewalls, or logging systems) are active, even if they haven’t been thoroughly tested over months.
3. Define the Audit Scope: Clarify which services, systems, or processes the auditor will examine so there are no surprises.
4. Pick an Audit Date Wisely: Schedule it when you’re truly confident everything is ready. If you discover major gaps, reschedule—don’t scramble last-minute.

The main advantage of Type I is speed. But remember, the end goal is usually Type II, so use the audit findings to fine-tune your environment for the next phase.

Preparing for a Type II Audit

Type II demands proven consistency, so operationalising your controls is critical.

1. Automate Evidence Collection: Where possible, set up tools that automatically gather logs, screenshots, and reports (e.g., for monthly access reviews or daily log checks).
2. Maintain a Compliance Calendar: Mark key tasks—like quarterly user access reviews or monthly vulnerability scans. Missing even one instance can be flagged by auditors.
3. Mid-Period Mini-Audits: Perform an internal check halfway through your audit period. If something isn’t followed (e.g., a missed server patch), you can correct it before the official audit.
4. Stay Organised: Proper labelling and storage of evidence is vital. Sloppy documentation can lead to confusion and rework during the final audit.

With these measures in place, you’ll accumulate consistent proof that your controls work. That’s the hallmark of a successful Type II.

Timeline Planning Example

For those starting from scratch, atypical journey might look like this:

• Months 1–3: Implement foundational policies, security tools, and internal processes.
• Month 4: Conduct a SOC 2 Type I audit to validate design.
• Months 5–9: Operate and refine those controls. Collect evidence each month (log reports, incident records, etc.).
• Months 10–11: Undergo the Type II audit, spanning the prior operating period.
• Month 12: Finalise the audit and share the Type II report with stakeholders.

Alternatively, if you skip Type I, you might spend the first 6 months establishing controls, then another 6months gathering operational evidence. By the end of the year, you’d be ready for a Type II audit in one go.

Leveraging Type I for Type II Success

Type I is often considered a “dress rehearsal” for Type II. Use your Type I auditor’s unofficial feedback—like minor weaknesses they notice, even if not listed formally—to strengthen processes immediately. That way, you’re better positioned for a smooth Type II.

Practical tips:

• Patch policy gaps right after Type I.
• Introduce monthly internal checks so you can catch lapses early.
• Engage the same auditor (if possible) for Type II, as they already know your environment.

Communicating with Customers

If you’ve only achieved Type I and a client requests Type II, be transparent:

• Acknowledge Your Current State: “We have Type I, validating our control design.”
• Share the Roadmap: “We’re midway through our 6-month operation window and expect a Type II audit in Q3.”
• Build Trust: Provide partial evidence or detail interim milestones. Many clients accept this, recognising the time investment required for a Type II.

In some competitive sales cycles, being open about your timeline can be better than staying silent. Demonstrating a solid plan often reassures prospects that you’re serious about sustained compliance.

Conclusion

SOC 2 Type I and Type II each serve distinct purposes. If you’re new to compliance or need quick validation, Type I can suffice in the short run. However, mature clients and markets increasingly expect Type II’s ongoing assurance. Whichever route you choose, meticulous planning and sustained operational discipline are your keys to success.

Looking for guidance on which SOC 2 path is best for you? Contact Atoro today to schedule a complimentary SOC2 strategy consultation. We’ll help you map out a realistic timeline, avoid common pitfalls, and expedite your journey toward robust, continually verified security. Or, download our “Type I vs Type II Decision Guide” for a concise summary of their differences and preparation steps.

‍